Quantcast Courier
College Media Network

Drinking Age Laws Shouldn't Be Changed

Nicholas Cotton

Posted on: 10/8/08 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
In response to the Amethyst Initiative, an organization of college presidents and chancellors calling for the lowering of the drinking age in the United States, there has been an uproar by many concerned lawmakers, researchers, and parents across the country that believe the idea to be foolhardy.

At a very basic level, the initiative is a selfish move by many of the nation's college presidents to eliminate binge drinking on their campuses, not a complete and relevant look at the topic of binge drinking and underage drinking.

While drinking among those under the age of 21 is both widely prevalent and inevitable, the point remains that underage drinking is frowned upon in American culture.

In France, Italy, Germany, and Great Britain, the lax drinking laws are combined with youths drinking from an early age with their parents, thus making it part of the culture.

In the United States, most parents do not support their children drinking alcohol before it is legally allowed.

Research has shown that, after Reagan signed the Uniform Drinking Age Act in 1984, the number of car accidents significantly lowered in states that implemented a minimum age of 21 than in those that waited a few years. The CDC cites a study by its Task Force on Community Preventive Services that acknowledges a 16 percent decline in crashes among underage youth in states where this occurred.

Furthermore, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, a non-profit organization dedicated to its namesake's cause, cites similar studies by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration which reveal a decrease in alcohol-related car accidents after all states mandated a minimum age of 21 to purchase alcohol.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 7 of 7

Drug Detox

posted 2/18/09 @ 2:45 AM PST

Some very good points made here, thank you for this great article. I completely agree that the notion to lower the drinking age is selfish and neglects the important purpose of the age 21 law's role of protecting lives. (Continued…)

emily

posted 2/25/09 @ 4:14 PM PST

hellllloooo :)
i love this article.
woooooooo!

Drug Treatment

posted 2/26/09 @ 1:44 AM PST

Drink and drive is quite easy to educate, but it would require severe punishment: death penalty. It is quite simple: if you kill a person will drunk and driving, you will get the death penalty. (Continued…)

Stan.Bally

Acoustics Physics Assignment

posted 7/13/09 @ 7:30 AM PST

They can start drinking from 21. It's really wise, young people can have problems with alcohol in earlier age.

Adam Kratt

posted 7/17/09 @ 9:33 AM PST

The drinking age should remain at 21 and not be lowered. And I disagree with a comment above regarding the death penatly if someone is killed due to a drunk driver, I believe a life sentence would be appropriate. (Continued…)

kevin hill

posted 5/06/10 @ 9:24 PM PST

Thanks for sharing. i really appreciate it that you shared with us such a informative post..
lab report | research paper

Liz

posted 5/13/10 @ 1:40 PM PST

Though drinking and driving can lead to serious consequences, the death penalty is a bit harsh, and a life sentence would only put additional strain on the already pressured jail/prison system!

One strike law doesn't sound unreasonable - considering, that once is all it takes to ruin someone's life/family. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Are you having trouble registering for the classes you need?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement